Some More Movement on Health Care

Possibly we just need to move all House and Senate sessions to Saturday evenings, ideally before holidays. We can give them a big list of what needs doing and tell them they can’t leave until the list is cleared.

I mention this because on Saturday evening, the Senate finally voted to hold a full debate on health care reform. It’s not a big step, but it’s a start and I’m glad to see there’s finally some progress.

Also, it was my best friend’s 36th birthday. Happy birthday, Rob!

The Wet Moon

(that’s either the title of a really bad porno or a really good, artsy foreign film)

So NASA has found what they’re describing as “significant” levels of water on the Moon! This is amazing, and a wonderful thing, because it makes and sort of long-term Moon colonization much easier. Water is heavy, and having to lift it from the Earth to the Moon would’ve been hard and expensive. If it’s already there, much easier!

Now let’s get off our asses and get back there!

And So Progress is Made

The House has passed a health care reform bill. Wonderful!

I notice there was all sorts of late-hour wrangling to make sure that abortion wouldn’t be covered by the public option. Well, of course not. No reason why a completely legal medical procedure should be covered, especially since the people who can’t afford it are the same ones least likely to be able to afford a baby.

I really, really hope any sort of health care reform includes free birth control for them as wants it. If you won’t cover termination of pregnancy, you better do everything you can to prevent that pregnancy to begin with.

A Bit of Good, a Bit of Bad

So the great 2009 election chaos is over. Yes, for those who hadn’t noticed there were five important elections last night. These were governor’s races in New Jersey and Virginia, Question One in Maine, a Congressional race in NY 23, and Referendum 71 in Washington State.

Now the two governor’s races and the Congressional race were about local issues so it was, of course, all about Obama. Well, at least according to the MSM and the GOP. I noticed the GOP crowing long and loud last night about their crowning achievement in unseating two incumbent governors who just happened to be Democrats. This is, to them, proof that the GOP is back and on the rise and about to destroy the hated, unpopular Obama, etc.

Oddly I notice that they’re ignoring NY 23 where, at least in part due to the GOP turning on its own, the conservative candidate lost. Clearly that was a referendum on the GOP’s policies and, obviously, it means that the GOP is on the decline and the Democrats are about to destroy them, etc.

The lesson here is that all three of those elections were local elections about local issues and have no real national significance.

Meantime, a little bit of bad and a little bit of good for gay rights issues. The voters in Maine choose to outlaw gay marriage after their legislature and government passed it and this despite my personal plea for them not to be a state of dicks. I am very disappointed in you, Maine! I expected better than for you to prove that direct democracy is a bad idea.

Over in Washington state we see how wonderful direct democracy is as a gay rights bill there pass, showing public support for civil unions. Knowing what I know about Washington and how the courts have ruled, I’m guessing that within two years we’ll have a court ruling there saying that giving all the rights of marriage but calling it a “civil union” is discrimination illegal.

So five races. Two went the way I wanted. Three didn’t. I don’t view any of these as having any real national significance beyond, say, next week. By this time in 2010 we’ll have all forgotten about them.

More on the Marijuana

macro_cannabis_bud

From the Times of London comes an article by Andrew Sullivan about legalizing marijuana and how, basically, in some areas of the USA, it’s already happened. It’s a good article, and one I highly recommend reading.

I really hope the laws on this do change. Keeping pot illegal is very, very stupid (as are the laws keeping other drugs illegal). People are going to use it, in large numbers, and without paying taxes on it. They’ll also continue to fund a lot of the very evil behavior by drug lords around the world.

Make it legal, make it safer, make some money off it.

Defining Our Goals

625px-Flag_of_Afghanistan_svg

There’s a lot of bru-ha-ha going on over Obama’s apparent indecision over what to do next in Afghanistan. The right is pointing out that the general in charge wants more troops, so he should be given them (ignoring the fact that all generals always want more troops), and the left is tapping their feet impatiently, waiting for Obama to bring all the troops home.

I don’t know what our next step in Afghanistan should be, but to be fair, I have a good reason not to know: I’m not sure why we’re there.

See, we went in initially eight years ago looking for bin Laden and to break up the Taliban. Well, bin Laden has probably been hiding in Pakistan since then and the Taliban are no longer officially in charge of the country.

So why are we still there, exactly? What’s our long-term goal in the country? If we’re there to bring democracy, we already have done and it’s up to the people there to make it work. We can’t do that for them.

If it’s to get rid of the Taliban, again, we already have done, sort of. They still control large portions of the country, but surely that’s an internal problem the Afghanis need to deal with?

If it’s to break up Al Qaeda, well, that’s long since been accomplished. They haven’t managed to do anything really huge since 9/11 and probably never will again. Anyhow, at this point they’re broken up into a few scattered cells and that’s going to require police, not the military.

I don’t particularly object to us remaining in Afghanistan, and yes, if we’re going to stay, a lot more troops wouldn’t hurt. But if we’re going to stay there, we need a clear reason why and clear long term goals and currently we don’t have either.

Be Happy You Don’t Live in Uganda *

* unless you do, in which case, damn! Sorry. :(

800px-Flag_of_Uganda_svg

Uganda has never been known as a great bastion of human rights and economic development. The country’s reputation wasn’t ever wonderful and, let’s face it, Idi Amin didn’t help matters (though his reign of evil made for a great movie). So, yeah, life sucks in Uganda, but it really sucks if you’re gay. But for some people it doesn’t suck enough, and they want to make it far, far worse.

Let me introduce you to the 2009 Anti-Homosexuality Bill. This bill would do a number of unpleasant things, such as this list which I lifted from Box Turtle Bulliten’s article on the subject.

■Reaffirm the lifetime sentence currently provided upon conviction of homosexuality, and extends the definition from sexual activity to merely “touch[ing] another person with the intention of committing the act of homosexuality.”
■Create a new category of “aggravated homosexuality” which provides for the death penalty for “repeat offenders” and for cases where the individual is HIV-positive.
■Criminalizes all speech and peaceful assembly for those who advocate on behalf of LGBT citizens in Uganda with fines and imprisonment of between five and seven years.
■Criminalizes the act of obtaining a same-sex marriage abroad with lifetime imprisonment.
■Adds a clause which forces friends or family members to report LGBT persons to police within 24-hours of learning about that individual’s homosexuality or face fines or imprisonment of up to three years.
■Adds an extra-territorial and extradition provisions, allowing Uganda to prosecute LGBT Ugandans living abroad.

Well, how fun.

To my gay friends in Uganda, as well as to anyone there who values freedom and justice, I say fight this bill, and fight it hard! Don’t make your country worse!

And to those who support it, I say fuck you. Go die in a fire.

Gay in Guam

750px-Flag_of_Guam_svg

Guam, America’s overseas territory that most people don’t know exists, is debating Bill 185, which would extend domestic partner benefits to same-sex couples. Naturally the Catholic Church, you know, the greatest force of evil in the world, feels the need to intrude their nose into this.

Sadly, it turns out that the major sponsor of this bill, BJ Cruz, who is openly gay, was himself molested at the age of thirteen by a priest. I really wish that surprised me more.

Even better is the stance of the Archdiocese who felt the need to put out a letter on the subject. Read it closely, especially the part where they talk in admiration about Islamic funamentalists executing people for being gay. Fun times!

The Catholic Church needs to shut the fuck up and stay out of politics! Good luck, everyone in Guam! Make it happen!

Another Reason to Detest Beck and Limbaugh

Yep, turns out they’re both anti-vaxers, or at least something close to it. Sad, but not surprising.

Hey, anti-vaxers! You like having these guys on your side?

WTF, Mate?

Obama… Nobel Peace Prize… buh?!

Ok, I’ll admit, I’m confuzzled here. Yes, I like Obama and have a great deal of respect for the man. I’m also angry at him for dragging his feat on repealing DOMA and “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell,” and for begining the health care debate with a compromise position, so I’d like to feel that I have a somewhat more nuanced view than some in the Democratic party who believe flowers sprout from his feet where he walks.

Obama hasn’t really done much at this point to justify winning the Nobel Peace Prize. Ok, he’s rebuilt our reputation internationally, and that’s no small thing, and has started to scale back a lot of the evil done by the Bush administration, but he hasn’t done all that much yet. He probably will in the future, but not yet.

That said, there’s certainly been worse choices (Kissinger and Arafat), and if we’re all lucky he’ll take this as yet another expectation he has to live up to, and do what he can to make a better, more peaceful world.

Until then, I will remain slightly baffled.

EDIT: Check out this nicely done article on the matter by Andrew Sullivan.