Since the nomination of Sonia Sotomayor to the Supreme Court, there’s been a great hue and cry on the part of the Right, trying to figure out how to fight back against someone who is Hispanic and female without appearing to be a pack of racist/sexist jerks. Of course, the way to do this is to fight someone on their record which is, more or less, what they’re doing.
I have, however, noticed an annoying trend by people on the issue of her confirmation. One thing that’s come up, raised by the likes of Rush Limbaugh, is the possibility that she’s someone who is dedicated to putting Hispanics first and everyone else second. The word for this behavior is “racist”.
Now I don’t think that’s what she’s done. I think she’s delivered some well-reasoned opinions on legal cases so far and I expect she’ll continue to do so after she sails through confirmation. But I don’t have a problem with thinking the Right is wrong on this issue, I just have a problem with a term they often use; “reverse racism”.
I hate that term on so many levels. First, it implies that only white people can be actual racists. Everyone else can’t. That’s very stupid.
But second, what does “reverse racism” actually mean? I know what it implies (see above), but what does the term itself mean? Surely it means someone who isn’t white and puts their race ahead of all others, especially whites. But the word for that is “racist”.
Of course the media just lets use of this word slide on by and even tends to use it themselves. It’s somehow “better” than actually just calling someone’s attitudes or behavior racist, especially if they’re members of a group frequently targeted for racist treatment themselves.
Oh, well. As I’ve said before, I long for the day we can move past such meaningless distinctions as the color of someone’s skin. It’s got to be one of the most pointless things to focus on. I’m sure there’s far better ways we as a society can spend our time.